How the Vještica lab uses fission yeast to understand how new life begins

Edited by Lukas Breitzler

Billions of years ago, in the primordial waters of early life, life consisted entirely of single cells. Organisms could only reproduce by making identical copies of themselves. It worked—but it came with serious limitations. If a cell carried mutations in its genome, each division would propagate them, slowly degrading the genome with each new generation. Life also lacked diversity which made it susceptible to attack. If a virus or parasite threatened one cell, it could threaten them all. Cells therefore evolved a trick that would form one of the foundations on which complex life evolved: they learned to fuse with other cells and combine their DNA—a process called cell-fusion. Billions of years later, a version of cell-fusion still happens during sexual reproduction in many animals, and even in humans.

Researchers in the Vještica lab study this ancestral process in Schizosaccharomyces pombe—a type of yeast widely used as a research organism in modern biology. When observed under one of the lab’s high-resolution microscopes, it looks deceptively simple. Two rod-shaped cells meet, their tips dissolve, and their contents merge into one. Yet hidden inside that smooth sequence is an enormous amount of molecular traffic. The genetic material or DNA (residing in a part of the cell called nucleus) need to be converted to messengers called RNA. This messages then need to be sent outside of the nucleus where they are translated to dictate which proteins to produce. Some of these messages will be stabilized while others will be destroyed, and proteins need to be turned on or off at exactly the right moment.

“We want to understand how a cell completely rewires its gene expression program from the moment when cells fuse” explains Ayokunle Araoyinbo, who carried out this project in the Vještica lab. How is all of this coordinated so precisely, and what happens when it goes wrong? A new publication by the lab now uncovered that a protein—Mei2—once thought to work only in one part of the cell actually has a surprising second job elsewhere.

Scientists had long thought of Mei2 as a kind of switch that tells yeast cells when to start reproduction. Cells without Mei2 won’t reproduce, and cells with prematurely active Mei2 start reproducing too early. Previously it was thought that Mei2 did most of its work in the nucleus—the cell’s control center. But when researchers in the Vjestica lab tagged Mei2 with a bright fluorescent protein and watched its movement under a high resolution microscope, they saw something unexpected: during fertilization, Mei2 didn’t only stay in the nucleus. They noticed it also gathered in molecular structures called P-bodies, small droplets inside cells that were previously thought of as generic storage bins or recycling centers for RNA.

“Even when we forced Mei2 into the nucleus using our genetic tools, we could see it leaving the nucleus and decorating P-bodies as soon as cells fused” said Ayokunle.

Now that the researchers saw Mei2 drawn to these structures, two interesting questions emerged. Why was Mei2 drawn to these P-bodies? And what were they doing when cells fused that made them such hotspots for Mei2?

To answer the first question, the researchers turned to proteins that work like an on-off switch for Mei2. They created yeast strains in which one part of this switch, called Mei3, was intentionally disabled and watched how Mei2 moved inside the cell. Without Mei3, Mei2 stayed inactive—and importantly—it never moved into P-bodies. This revealed something important. The same signal that activates Mei2 also controls where it goes.

But to understand what Mei2 was actually doing in P-bodies, the team had to go beyond watching and start testing. They genetically engineered yeast strains carrying different versions of Mei2. Some variants could no longer switch on properly, some could no longer latch onto the RNA molecules that they usually interact with, and some could not longer travel to certain parts in the cell. By comparing how these modified Mei2 proteins behaved, the team could pinpoint which features of Mei2 were essential for the early steps of cell-fusion. These experiments revealed that Mei2 uses different “parts” of itself for different steps. One region helps it grab onto specific RNA messages and transport them outside the nucleus, another regulates whether an RNA message is converted into proteins.

One result especially unveiled that P-bodies are far from passive structure that happen to collect Mei2. Normally, cells with prematurely active versions of Mei2 will attempt to reproduce too early, usually with fatal consequences. But when the researchers disrupted a core component of P-bodies, even this version of Mei2 stopped causing harm. The cells survived. This showed that P-bodies are essential partners that enable Mei2 to perform its function during Schizosaccharomyces pombe‘s sexual reproduction.

On paper, yeast sexual reproduction could not seem further from human development. Yet the principles uncovered in this study shed light one of biology’s most important transitions.

By probing this process using high resolution microscopes and clever genetic engineering, the Vjestica lab shows that the decisions cells make depend not just on the genes they carry, but also on how they manage the products of those genes. “The core idea is that cells don’t just turn genes on and off at the level of RNA production,” Ayokunle notes. “The integrity of a cell indeed relies on where an RNA goes, how long they stay there, and which proteins accompany them. Granules like P-bodies are central to that logic.”

By working in a system where this entire process can be filmed and perturbed in single cells, the Vještica lab can dissect this logic in detail.

link to the scientific publication

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. auth.: group Gatfield

Daily liver rhythms: Coupling morphological and molecular oscillations

Ueli Schibler 1Flore Sinturel 2Felix Naef 3Alan Gerber 4 5David Gatfield 6

. 2025 Sep 9;122(36):e2517648122.

 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2517648122. Epub 2025 Aug 29.

Abstract

In mammals, a hierarchically organized circadian timing system orchestrates daily rhythms of nearly all physiology. A master pacemaker in the brain’s suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) synchronizes subsidiary clocks in most peripheral organs. By driving anabolic and catabolic cycles of proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates and by detoxifying endo- and xenobiotic components, the liver plays an important role in adapting the metabolic needs to rest-activity rhythms. In keeping with these functions, the liver expresses many clock-controlled genes that are required for these processes. Remarkably, however, this organ also fluctuates in size and morphological parameters. In mice, the mass of the liver increases and decreases by 30 to 40% during the 24-h day. The oscillation in liver mass is accompanied by daily rhythms of similar amplitudes in hepatocyte cell size and global RNA and protein accumulation. The number of ribosomes, which parallels the ups and downs of liver size, appears to be the rate-limiting factor in driving the diurnal rhythms of overall protein synthesis. Obviously, the rapid increase in hepatocyte size within the liver engenders mechanical stress, which must be dealt with by increasing the physical robustness of cells. Indeed, the actin cytoskeleton of hepatocytes undergoes dramatic polymerization cycles. Thus, massive intracellular and subcortical F-actin bundles are assembled during the night, at which the liver reaches its maximal size. In turn, the oscillation in actin polymerization elicits rhythms in myocardin-related transcription factors-serum response factor signaling, which participate in the circadian transcription of the core clock gene Per2 and thereby contribute to the synchronization of hepatocyte clocks.

Glia; auth.: S.Geller (group Fajas)

Hypothalamic Astrocytes Exhibit Glycolytic Features Making Them Prone for Glucose Sensing

Sarah Geller 1 2Nadège Zanou 3 4Sylviane Lagarrigue 4Tamara Zehnder 5Cathy Gouelle 4 5Tania Santoro 1 6Cendrine Repond 4Paola Bezzi 5 7Francesca Amati 4 8Anne-Karine Bouzier-Sore 9Ariane Sharif 10Luc Pellerin 1 11

. 2025 Nov;73(11):2253-2272.

 doi: 10.1002/glia.70066. Epub 2025 Jul 24.

Abstract

In the hypothalamus, detection of energy substrates such as glucose is essential to regulate food intake and peripheral energy homeostasis. Metabolic interactions between astrocytes and neurons via lactate exchange have been proposed as a hypothalamic glucose-sensing mechanism, but the molecular basis remains uncertain. Mouse hypothalamic astrocytes in vitro were found to exhibit a stronger glycolytic phenotype in basal conditions than cortical astrocytes. It was associated with higher protein expression levels of the Pyruvate Kinase Isoform M2 (Pkm2) and its more prominent nuclear localization. In parallel, hypothalamic astrocytes also expressed higher levels of the monocarboxylate transporter Slc16a3 (Mct4), which were dependent on Pkm2 expression. The stronger Mct4 expression in hypothalamic versus cortical astrocytes is an intrinsic characteristic, as it was also present after their direct isolation from adult mouse tissue. The high lactate release capacity of hypothalamic astrocytes was demonstrated to depend on the expression of Mct4, but not Mct1. Unlike cortical astrocytes, hypothalamic astrocytes in culture do not respond to glutamate with enhanced glycolysis, but instead, they modulate their lactate production according to glucose concentrations in an AMPK-dependent manner, an effect observed in both mouse and human hypothalamic astrocytes in vitro. Our study shows that hypothalamic and cortical astrocytes are geared to have distinct glycolytic responses to glucose and glutamate, respectively. These results reveal a metabolic specialization of astrocytes in order to fulfill distinct area-specific functions: glucose-sensing in the hypothalamus versus activity-dependent neuronal energetic supply in cortical regions.

Plant Direct; auth.: group Fankhauser

Early Flowering 3 (ELF3) Inhibits Hypocotyl Phototropism in Light-Grown Arabidopsis Seedlings

Geoffrey M C Cobb 1Johanna Krahmer 1 2Ganesh M Nawkar 1 3Alessandra Boccaccini 1 4Sandi Paulišić 1Christian Fankhauser 1

. 2025 Sep 23;9(9):e70107.

 doi: 10.1002/pld3.70107. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Phototropic bending of plants towards a light source allows them to position their photosynthetic tissues to optimize light capture. In light-grown (de-etiolated) Arabidopsis seedlings, phototropic bending of the hypocotyl is inhibited by light with a high red:far-red ratio (HRFR) and high levels of blue light (HBL). This occurs via activation of the phytochrome B (phyB) and cryptochrome 1 (cry1) photoreceptor signaling pathways. Both phyB and cry1 act upstream of PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR (PIF) transcription factors, which are required for hypocotyl bending in light-grown seedlings. Presently, it is not known whether other pathways are involved in the inhibition of PIF-mediated phototropism in light-grown seedlings. To address this, we conducted a screen to identify mutants with increased phototropic bending relative to wild type in HRFR + HBL conditions. Through this screen, we identified EARLY FLOWERING 3 (ELF3), a member of the Evening Complex (EC), as a key inhibitor of phototropic bending in green seedlings. We show that both ELF3 and LUX, another component of the EC, inhibit phototropic bending upstream of PIF4/PIF5. Furthermore, we show that phototropic bending in Arabidopsis seedlings is subject to circadian regulation in an ELF3-dependent manner. Finally, we provide evidence that ELF3 in the grass Brachypodium distachyon also affects phototropism but in an opposite way than in Arabidopsis.

Nat Photonics, co-auth.: N.Vastenhouw

Structured detection for simultaneous super-resolution and optical sectioning in laser scanning microscopy

Alessandro Zunino # 1Giacomo Garrè # 1 2Eleonora Perego 1 3Sabrina Zappone 1 2Mattia Donato 1Nadine Vastenhouw 3Giuseppe Vicidomini 1

. 2025;19(8):888-897.

 doi: 10.1038/s41566-025-01695-0. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

Abstract

Fast detector arrays enable an effective implementation of image scanning microscopy, which overcomes the trade-off between spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio of confocal microscopy. However, current image scanning microscopy approaches do not provide optical sectioning and fail with thick samples unless the detector size is limited, thereby introducing a new trade-off between optical sectioning and signal-to-noise ratio. Here we propose a method that overcomes such a limitation. From single-plane acquisition, we reconstruct an image with digital and optical super-resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio and enhanced optical sectioning. On the basis of the observation that imaging with a detector array inherently embeds axial information, we designed a straightforward reconstruction algorithm that inverts the physical model of image scanning microscopy image formation. We present a comprehensive theoretical framework and validate our method with images of biological samples captured using a custom setup equipped with a single-photon avalanche diode array detector. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach by exciting fluorescence emission in both linear and nonlinear regimes. Moreover, we generalize the algorithm for fluorescence lifetime imaging, fully exploiting the single-photon timing ability of the single-photon avalanche diode array detector. Our method outperforms conventional reconstruction techniques and can be extended to any laser scanning microscopy technique.